I had forgotten what turbo lag felt like, that seemingly long
wait for the turbo to spool up and the boost to go charging
through the drivetrain to the wheels, usually at a time not of
your choosing. Catch the A3’s 2.0-liter gasoline direct injection
turbo motor off the boost, and you’ll quickly remember what this
holdover from the 1980s feels like. Unlike those cars, however,
it is much easier to eliminate the situations where it raises its
ugly head. That’s because you can quickly drop down a gear or two
with the slick six-speed manual gearbox, or modulate the
resulting thrust once the turbos come on song with a precision of
which drivers in the 1980s only dreamt. All of which means the A3
isn’t the temperamental beast so many turbocharged cars of
yesteryear were.
The rest of the car is solid, wrapped in sleek bodywork that
combines typical Audi styling cues with a bit more flair and dash
than expected. Inside, the look is budget Audi TT with that car’s
large round air vents jutting out from a clean, ergonomically
friendly instrument panel. It’s not the most luxurious interior,
by far, but it combines a number of related textures and
materials in a way that does not at first suggest the interior
would be easy to hose out, or cell phones and iPods would stay
still on the panel’s surface under all but the most demanding
conditions. As a young person’s car, it is in keeping with the
demographic without being jarring or out-of-place.
If the A3 has any real faults, they are pretty well confined
to overall feel and packaging. The car feels light and limber,
which is not what you expect from an Audi. Usually there is a
trace – or more – of ponderousness and weight to be found in the
controls or responses. That’s not the case with the A3. It almost
feels too light, though it never lapses into the
quasi-effortlessness found in many Asian vehicles. Unfortunately,
this driver was distracted by a dead pedal that was on a plane
closer than the throttle pedal to the seat. This meant adjusting
the seat for the optimal use of and comfort behind the pedals
caused the left leg to be – literally – a bit too close for
comfort, and caused pain in the knee during drives of any length.
It is quite distracting, and might lead some to look for
alternatives.
For an entry-level model, this isn’t the least expensive
choice in this market. If you’re thinking of choosing between,
say, either a Scion xB or tC and an A3, you’d best be ready for a
nearly $10,000 price difference. An A3 starts at $24,740, and
with the $720 destination charge, stickers for a reasonable
$25,460. Start adding on the options, however, and the A3’s
bottom line can pass $30,000 as quickly as the vehicle itself can
pass a dawdling truck on the freeway.
Judiciously choosing options can keep the price reasonable,
and still leaves one with a vehicle that is worth the money. The
A3 isn’t so much a wagon as it is a small sedan with a backpack,
which offers the greatest flexibility to a buyer set that has
many needs and even more desires, but few options or
opportunities when it comes to their sole vehicle. Those with
more disposable income can opt for the panoramic roof, satellite
radio, and move up to the 3.2-liter V6 and all-wheel-drive when
they arrive, but this is one vehicle where it is safe to say that
the base engine option is the best choice. True, you may have to
slightly modify your driving habits to make the best use of the
turbocharged four, but you get better all-around fuel economy,
pretty decent performance, and less weight on the nose in
return.