A Buick: At Last.
If I was marketing the Lucerne, that’s the line, or one
like it, that I would use. Assuming there is something to be
said for heritage—and I think there is—then the Lucerne delivers
(at last) on the promise of a solid, stylish American sedan.
And if I have a quibble about the car, it’s that it
shamelessly trades on a design cue of days gone by in a way that,
perhaps, sends the wrong message: the fake port holes in the
front quarter panels. Yes, they are park of
Buick’s
“design vocabulary,” but “forsooth” is part of the English
vocabulary, and I don’t now of anyone outside of a Shakespearean
troupe that needs to bust out with that term.
To build a better car, Buick started with the underpinnings
of the Cadillac DTS. That’s right: this Buick is based on a
Cadillac, and if there is any line of cars from any maker that
has shown itself to be, for the most part, free of having
anything to apologize for, it’s Cadillac. They’ve started from a
good place.
But this leads to another issue. If you’ve seen the TV ads
for the Lucerne, you’ve heard that
they’re making a comparison with the Lexus ES 330. The Lucerne is
available with a V8, a 275-hp, 4.6-liter mill. The ES doesn’t
have a V8. But that’s missing the point. No one is likely to
cross-shop those cars. Remember: Buick is a classic American
brand, and those who are thinking about a Lexus are more likely
to consider Infiniti or Acura. Buick needs to concentrate on
Lincoln and Chrysler, not Lexus.
One point that is made in that ad that is borne out in
performance is the fact that this car is as quiet as a vault.
OK, maybe not that quiet, but you’d be hard-pressed to find
another car that envelopes you in a rolling cone of silence.
Couple that with the optional Magnetic Ride Control (it uses
magnetic particles in a conductive fluid that adjusts the shock
in the blink of an eye) and you’re riding silent and
smooth—yet you don’t get the sensation of Buicks of Before, where
the portholes were appropriate because the car wallowed like some
sea-faring conveyance .
A point in the ad that isn’t entirely reflective, is that
while the car does, indeed, start at $25,990 (MSRP), that’s not
the version with the V8. The base MSRP for the CXL with the
V8—and with a four-speed automatic, which is not exactly
competitive with cars nowadays: heck, a Camry is available with a
six-speed automatic—is $30,265, and with the heated and cooled
seats, etc., etc., etc., you’re bumping $36K, which strikes me as
Cadillac territory: the DTS starts at $41,990, which makes the
Lucerne a bargain, but the CTS starts at $29,990, so isn’t there
a bit of pricing conflict here?
Inside, the gauges are clear and simple and the materials,
for the most part, are appropriate. One problem is that I had a
cream-colored interior and while there was a leather seating
surface, the sides of the seat were cloth, which isn’t a
particularly good material to be right next to the cupholders in
the center console: Think mixing coffee and cream—not good.
Assessment: Wouldn’t you really rather have a Buick?
Perhaps now you would.