Loading the player ...
Iscar Metals
Autofield Blog

Top 10 Lists: KBB.com & “Most Comfortable Under $30K”


By: Gary S. Vasilash 23. September 2014

Comfortable, quiet and cheap. I mean economical. That’s what the folks at kbb.com went for in their listing of the “Most Comfortable New Cars.”

It isn’t clear whether they used themselves as test subjects or used one of those robots that are used by Johnson Controls to measure the pressures of a derriere in a seat.

2014 Chevrolet Impala

The one they named the most comfortable is the Chevrolet Impala.

Which is, I will agree, a nice car. But it should be noted that the MSRP for the base trim level, the LS, is $27,885, so they’re squeaking under that $30,000 mark, especially when you take into account that the next higher trim, the 1LT, is $30,135, and it only goes up from there.

The other nine:

2014 Volvo S60

2014 Chrysler 300

2014 Buick Regal

2014 Toyota Avalon

2014 Nissan Altima

2014 Honda Accord

2014 Volkswagen Passat

2014 Buick Verano

2015 Volkswagen Golf

Two observations:

1. When it comes to comfort, the Buick Regal and Verano don’t hold a candle to Buicks of not-too-distant memory, so there ought to be a disqualification for that.

2. The Golf is one of the most enjoyable cars I’ve had the opportunity to drive this year, but how that makes it even into 10th place is an utter mystery.  It is not that it isn’t comfortable for the type of car that it is—which is a car that is meant to be driven, not, in effect, to have a La-Z-Boy experience in.


Inside China’s Most Precise Crash Facility


By: Gary S. Vasilash 22. September 2014

For a while, videos of Chinese cars being crash tested and crumpling up like cheap suits were pretty much diversionary viewing in the West. But as the Chinese auto industry gets a depth of knowledge, thanks, undoubtedly, to the Western automotive OEMs who have setup joint ventures in that country in order to gain access to the seemingly ever-expanding market, it just may be that the joke will be on the West.

Messring

This occurs to us with a description of a crash-test facility that we recently received. The massive operation was produced for the Chongqing Automotive Research Institute (CAERI) by a German company, MESSRING, a firm that has built more than 100 crash-test facilities around the world.

This facility for CAERI has floor space of 269,098-sq ft. The acceleration track is 965-ft long.

There are two electric propulsion systems with a combined power rating of 2.4-mW. Vehicles weighing up to five tons can be accelerated to 74.5 mph before they collide with the impact block. Vehicles weighing up to 25 tons can be crash tested at the facility.

Tolerances are tight. The maximum permitted deviation in speed with the system under full load is ±0.09 mph. The tolerance bandwidth for two test vehicles colliding is ±0.4 in.

Nothing funny about this.

China crash


The Road to Smart Transportation: What About the Ruts?


By: Gary S. Vasilash 19. September 2014

“A tide of innovation has invigorated the global auto industry, and we are taking these giant leaps forward to remain a leader of new technology.

“We are not doing this for the sake of the technology itself. We are doing it because it’s what customers around the world want. Through technology and innovation, we will make driving safer.”

That was General Motors CEO Mary Barra during her keynote address at the Intelligent Transport System (ITS) World Congress in Detroit last week.

2015 Cadillac CTS

Cars talking to cars

She was talking about two new technologies.

One is vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication. This is a system wherein vehicles so equipped with the sensors and communications setup will be able to send/receive information about the driving environment from other so-equipped vehicles as well as from the infrastructure. This not only has the potential to improve safety, but to reduce congestion on the roads as drivers will have comprehensive information about their driving environment.

General Motors plans to introduce V2V on the 2017 Cadillac CTS.

The other technology is called “Super Cruise.” At least that’s the working name. This is an automated driving technology. This will include hands-off lane following (yes, no hands: the car steers itself), braking and speed control. This would allow the car to do the work in tedious driving situations, such as in bumper-to-bumper traffic, or during long road trips. (It should be noted that the driver is still to be “attentive.” No dozing.)

While all of this is certainly impressive, there is one thing that comes to mind, especially for those of us who live and drive in the southeastern Michigan region. There is serious attention being given to “intelligent” vehicles and highway systems. But for the most part, many of the roadways look like this:

Chevrolet Designs for Pothole Perseverance

Solid infrastructure is going to have to precede intelligent infrastructure.


Since When Did the FIA Care About Cash?


By: Gary S. Vasilash 18. September 2014

This past weekend the 2014/2015 FIA Formula E Championship kicked off with a race in Beijing. That’s “E” as in “electric.” Yes, electric car racing.

Renault Formula E 1

The FIA is the organization that puts on Formula One races. Formula One and all things associated with it tend to be over-the-top when it comes to monies spent.

Yet the Formula E seems to be quite different.

There will be 10 races in the season. According to the FIA, “All rounds will be one-day events with practice, qualifying and the race taking place in a single day in order to reduce costs and minimize disruption to the host city.”

This is about economy, not excess.

This is a spec series, at least from the standpoint that there is a single car homologated by the FIA. This is described as an approach that ensures “a balance between cost-effectiveness and sustainability.”

The car is a Spark-Renault SRT_1E. It is built by a French company, Spark Racing Technology. The carbon fiber and aluminum monocoque is built by Dallara. The electric powertrain and electronics come from McLaren Electronics Systems. Williams Advanced Engineering provides the batteries, which produce 200 kW, or approximately 270 hp. (During the race, the power is restricted to 150 kW, 202.5 hp. However, there is a “FanBoost,” which is a five-second increase to 180 kW, 243 hp, which is based on fans voting for particular cars.) The five-speed sequential gearbox with fixed ratios “to help reduce costs further” is from Hewland. Tires are from Michelin. And the whole thing is orchestrated by Renault.

To be sure, electric vehicles are about efficiency and economy. (OK, maybe the Nissan LEAF and Kia SOUL EV are and the Tesla Model S not so much.) But this emphasis on frugality is rather surprising.


2014 Lexus CT 200h


By: Gary S. Vasilash 17. September 2014

While I am loathe to directly quote a press release, I’m doing so here to make a point:

“In 2007, the F brand launched with IS F, a super sedan that catapulted the Lexus brand onto tracks and into driving purists’ hearts with a specially built 416 horsepower V8, track-tuned chassis and street-dominating attitude.
“Then came the Lexus LFA, a V10-powered supercar that sent a 552 hp, carbon-fiber shockwave through the world’s top sports car echelon.”

And:

“The ‘F’ stands for Fuji Speedway, where Lexus conducts much of its high-speed development. It could also stand for fun, as defined by three key elements: response, a continuous-acceleration feeling, and a sound that excites.”

The 2014 Lexus CT 200h in question here is the “F Sport” model.

CT 200h 1

Mind you, it is not a CT 200hF. But it has “F” accoutrements. Well, at least the grille is different than the ordinary model. There is a sport-tuned suspension. It rides on 17s. The steering wheel and shift knob are leather covered. And there is a nice F badge. Etc.

· Super sedan.

· Super car.

· Fuji Speedway.

· CT 200h.

As they say in those quizzes: “What doesn’t belong?”

The CT 200h is a sheep in wolf’s clothing.

Mind you, I really like the CT 200h, which, in the event you don’t know, is a hybrid. It has a 98-hp, 1.8-liter, four-cylinder engine that’s mated to the motors of the Hybrid Synergy Drive system for a total system output of 134 hp.

CT 200h 3

In “Redline” exterior paint, with black NuLuxe seats (a material that is not leather but seems like leather), and the huge aluminum pedals, it looks like a hot hatch.

But even if you turn the dial to the “Sport” mode (the other options are “Normal” and “Eco,” and there is a separate button that allows long-speed, short-distance EV travel), even though it adjusts throttle and steering response, you are not going to think to yourself, “Damn, this is a car that I just can’t wait to get to the nearest racetrack—if I don’t get a speeding ticket on my way there!”

In all honesty: while coming to speed on I-275 here in the Detroit metro, I became a bit discomfited. It got there, eventually, and then sailed right along, but if it is acceleration you’re looking for, perhaps the IS F is what you’re looking for—in fact, you might not even need to get to the IS F, as the 306-hp IS350 is plenty responsive (and you can get the F SPORT package for this, too, and really end up with a more credible car in the “super” category).

CT 200h 2

The remarkable part about the CT 200h is the miles per gallon performance, which I found to be better than that listed on the window sticker. I got 45 mpg without turning the nob to “Eco.” The sticker says a combined 42 mpg, so that’s certainly nothing to sniff at. While in recent months gas prices have remained fairly stable—and it should be noted that the car takes regular—and so people have generally thought that opting for a hybrid may not be worth it, two points:

1. Hybrid or not, the CT 200h is a nice car in that compact luxury category.

2. Do you honestly think that gas prices are going to continue to be low, or do you think that maybe, just maybe, if there is a war in the Middle East things may change pronto?

If you’re looking for a small, luxury hatch—and admittedly, there aren’t a whole lot of people in the U.S. for whom that statement has any relevance, as “luxury” and “hatch” seem to be words that can’t come together—then the CT 200h could be just the thing.

As to whether you’d opt for the F version or not—and the F additions look good, but the performance. . .not so much—is a matter of taste and perspective.

Mind you, Lexus not the only luxury brand that offers this sort of kit for cars that are not going to leave the person in the lane next to you shaking their head at the alacrity with which you get away when the signal turns green, but the CT 200h play is really about really good fuel efficiency. While there are plenty of other hybrids available, realize that you can count the ones that have a specific body style pretty much on one hand (and if you take the Prius variants out, you’ve got fingers left over).

This one is well done, indeed.

Selected specs

Engine: 1.8-liter DOHC four

Horsepower: 98 @ 5,200 rpm

Materials: Aluminum block and heads

Motor/generator: 650-V

Total system output: 134 hp

Transmission: electronically controlled continuously variable

Steering: Electric power steering

Wheelbase: 102.4 in.

Length: 171.2 in.

Width: 69.5 in.

Height: 57.3 in.

Coefficient of drag: 0.29

Seating capacity: 5

EPA passenger volume: 86.1 cu. ft.

EPA cargo volume: 14.3 cu. ft.

EPA: mpg city/highway/combined: 43/40/42 mpg

Technorati Tags: ,



« Prev | | Next »

RSS RSS  |  Atom Atom