|
|
The tremendous loss recently reported by General Motors and
the filings for bankruptcy of even more suppliers (and the
troubled efforts by others, like
There are plenty of things that people buy without the proverbial green eyeshades on. This ranges from replacing perfectly good iPods (“Gee, although I still have memory available on the one that I have, I may suddenly decide that I need several hundred more songs, so I’d better buy a new one with more memory. . . .”) to buying prepared foods in supermarkets (“Gee, I don’t have time to cook and I think that the McDonald’s routine is getting rather stale, and that food in the case at the market really looks good, so. . . .”). Admittedly, these are often things that cost a fraction of what a vehicle does. But aren’t there instances where people truly do spend more on cars than they would if it was all a simple manner of cost-effectiveness—did anyone ever really need a Hemi?
If the car industry can convince more customers that they’re getting desirable products, then they’ll start getting better margins. With better margins, they can produce still-better vehicles. Let’s face it: Although it may not occur for a number of years, when the Chinese auto manufacturers start selling cars in the U.S., the domestic vehicle manufacturers—be they Ford or Toyota or whomever—are going to have a horrible time trying to compete on price. So they’d better be competing on superior product at all price points.
Only by doing that can there be an upward, advantageous spiral.




